|
|
|
|
Group |
| |
|
|
|
2008 |
2007 |
| |
|
|
|
Rm |
Rm |
| 21. |
Net finance costs |
|
|
|
| |
21.1 |
Interest paid |
|
|
|
| |
|
Bank loans and overdrafts |
|
68.1 |
26.9 |
| |
|
Other |
|
0.1 |
2.7 |
| |
|
|
|
68.2 |
29.6 |
| |
21.2 |
Interest received |
|
|
|
| |
|
Bank |
|
(5.7) |
(2.7) |
| |
|
Other |
|
(0.8) |
(1.3) |
| |
|
|
|
(6.5) |
(4.0) |
| |
21.3 |
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
| |
|
Realised |
|
1.0 |
(13.6) |
| |
|
Unrealised |
|
(5.9) |
0.4 |
| |
|
|
|
(4.9) |
(13.2) |
| |
21.4 |
Net finance costs |
|
56.8 |
12.4 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 22. |
Taxation |
|
|
|
| |
22.1 |
Taxation charge |
|
|
|
| |
|
South Africa |
|
285.6 |
275.2 |
| |
|
Foreign |
|
17.4 |
16.7 |
| |
|
Taxation per income statement |
|
303.0 |
291.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Comprising: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Normal taxation |
|
|
|
| |
|
Current year |
|
168.0 |
270.3 |
| |
|
Prior year |
|
0.5 |
4.9 |
| |
|
Deferred taxation |
|
|
|
| |
|
Current year |
|
104.2 |
(9.2) |
| |
|
Prior year |
|
(0.2) |
(4.0) |
| |
|
Rate change |
|
(0.1) |
|
| |
|
Secondary Tax on Companies |
|
30.6 |
29.9 |
| |
|
Taxation per income statement |
|
303.0 |
291.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
22.2 |
The rate of taxation on profit is reconciled as follows: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Profit before taxation |
|
945.3 |
890.2 |
| |
|
Taxation calculated at a tax rate of 29% (2007: 29%) |
|
274.1 |
258.2 |
| |
|
Disallowed expenditure/(exempt income) |
|
(3.3) |
2.9 |
| |
|
Secondary Tax on Companies |
|
30.6 |
29.9 |
| |
|
Prior years |
|
0.3 |
0.9 |
| |
|
Differing tax rates in foreign countries |
|
1.4 |
|
| |
|
Rate change |
|
(0.1) |
|
| |
|
Taxation per income statement |
|
303.0 |
291.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Effective taxation rate |
|
32.1% |
32.8% |
| 23. |
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
| |
23.1 |
Weighted average number of shares |
|
000s |
000s |
| |
|
Weighted average shares for earnings and headline earnings per share |
|
89 583 |
92 062 |
| |
|
Dilution resulting from share awards and options outstanding |
|
220 |
396 |
| |
|
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings and headline earnings per share |
|
89 803 |
92 458 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Diluted earnings and headline earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares assuming that all share options will be exercised. The dilution is determined by the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market price of the shares) less the number of shares that would be issued on the exercise of all the share options. |
|
|
|
| |
23.2 |
Headline earnings |
|
Rm |
Rm |
| |
|
Attributable earnings |
|
642.3 |
598.3 |
| |
|
Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
(4.5) |
(3.8) |
| |
|
Profit on disposal of available-for-sale investments |
|
(22.1) |
(1.6) |
| |
|
Taxation |
|
2.2 |
1.3 |
| |
|
Headline earnings |
|
617.9 |
594.2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cents |
Cents |
| |
23.3 |
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
| |
|
Earnings per share |
|
717.0 |
649.9 |
| |
|
Fully diluted earnings per share |
|
715.2 |
647.1 |
| |
23.4 |
Headline earnings per share |
|
|
|
| |
|
Headline earnings per share |
|
689.8 |
645.4 |
| |
|
Fully diluted headline earnings per share |
|
688.1 |
642.7 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 24. |
Dividends paid |
|
Rm |
Rm |
| |
|
Dividend No.4 declared on 22 May 2006 and paid on 24 July 2006 |
|
|
137.0 |
| |
|
Dividend No.5 declared on 13 November 2006 and paid on 29 January 2007 |
|
|
116.0 |
| |
|
Dividend No.6 declared on 21 May 2007 and paid on 23 July 2007 |
|
150.0 |
|
| |
|
Dividend No.7 declared on 12 November 2007 and paid on 28 January 2008 |
|
142.8 |
|
| |
|
Dividends received on treasury shares: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Lewis Stores (Pty) Ltd |
|
(27.1) |
(17.3) |
| |
|
Lewis Employee Share Incentive Scheme Trust |
|
(3.0) |
(3.9) |
| |
|
|
|
262.7 |
231.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 25. |
Notes to the cash flow
statements |
|
|
|
| |
25.1 |
Cash generated from operations |
|
|
|
| |
|
Operating profit |
|
930.4 |
859.9 |
| |
|
Adjusted for: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Share-based payments |
|
6.7 |
4.0 |
| |
|
Depreciation |
|
40.9 |
38.9 |
| |
|
Surplus on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
(4.5) |
(3.8) |
| |
|
Movement in provision for doubtful debts |
|
18.3 |
9.5 |
| |
|
Movement in retirement benefits provision |
|
(9.9) |
(8.2) |
| |
|
Movement in other provisions |
|
14.0 |
11.1 |
| |
|
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase in inventories |
|
(1.9) |
(20.1) |
| |
|
Increase in trade and other receivables |
|
(440.3) |
(295.3) |
| |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in trade and other payables |
|
2.5 |
(4.5) |
| |
|
|
|
556.2 |
591.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
25.2 |
Taxation paid |
|
|
|
| |
|
Amount owing at the beginning of the year |
|
(61.7) |
(159.8) |
| |
|
Amount charged to the income statement |
|
(303.0) |
(291.9) |
| |
|
Adjustment for deferred taxation |
|
103.9 |
(13.2) |
| |
|
Amount owing at the end of the year |
|
(29.6) |
61.7 |
| |
|
|
|
(290.4) |
(403.2) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
25.3 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
| |
|
Cash deposits and cash on hand |
|
66.8 |
35.7 |
| |
|
Overdrafts and short-term interest-bearing borrowings |
|
(703.4) |
(429.3) |
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
(636.6) |
(393.6) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 26. |
Financial risk management Risk management is the identification of actual and potential areas of risk, followed by a process of risk mitigation. Responsibility for this process of risk management is with the Risk Working Group (RWG), a committee consisting of the members of the Executive Committee and the company secretary. The RWG formally reports to the Audit and Risk Committee on a bi-annual basis.
The RWG is responsible for identifying, evaluating and monitoring all significant risks facing the business. Members of the RWG are responsible for integrating risk management into the day-to-day activities of the business and ensuring that the staff are aware and accountable for managing risk and maintaining internal control.
The group is exposed to financial risks being credit risk, market risk (including currency, interest rate and price risks) and liquidity risk. The group manages the overall risk by focusing on minimising the potential adverse effects of these risks on the groups financial performance.
The groups primary business is that of a credit retailer. As such, credit risk features as the dominant financial risk. It provides the foundation of the groups profitability, yet the mismanagement of credit risk will threaten the ongoing sustainability of the business.
Due to its pervasive and strategic importance, credit policies are continually evaluated by the Executive Committee to ensure that they are in line with prudent lending practices, yet maintain the groups overall profitability and return on assets. The responsibility for the implementation of these policies rests with the Chief Operating Officer, Credit Risk executive and their teams.
|
| |
26.1 |
Credit risk |
| |
|
Credit risk is the risk of suffering financial loss, should any of the groups customers and counterparties fail to fulfil their contractual obligations with the group. The main credit risk faced is that customers will not meet their payment obligations in terms of the sale agreements concluded. The maximum credit exposure is that of accounts receivable, fixed income securities and deposits. |
| |
|
i) |
Accounts receivable |
| |
|
|
The group has developed advanced credit-granting systems to properly assess the customer. The credit underwriting process flows through the following stages. |
| |
|
|
Credit scoring: this involves the gathering of appropriate information from the client, use of credit bureaus and third parties such as employers. These input variables are run through the various credit scorecards. Lewis deals with its new customers and existing customers differently when credit scoring takes places. |
| |
|
|
|
The process differs as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
for new customers, application risk scorecards predict the risk with the emphasis for such an evaluation on information from credit bureaus and third-party information. |
| |
|
|
|
for existing customers,
behavioral scorecards have been developed to assess the risk
through predictive behaviour with the emphasis on the customers payment record with Lewis, bureau and other information being considered. |
| |
|
|
Assessing client affordability. This
process involves collecting information regarding the customer’s income
levels, expenses and current debt obligations. Lewis has developed its own
priority expense model based on surveys conducted with customers. |
| |
|
|
Determining the credit limit for the
customer. The customer’s risk score determined by the scorecard, together
with the expense assessment and outstanding obligations are used to
calculate a credit limit within the customer’s affordability level.
The credit granting systems enables the group to determine its appetite for
risk. In determining the acceptable level of risk, the potential loss is weighed
up against the revenue potential using the predictive behavioural models
inherent in the credit-granting system. The group monitors any variances from
the level of risk that has been adopted and adjusts the credit-granting process
on a dynamic basis.
The group manages its risk effectively by assessing the borrower’s ability to
service the proposed monthly instalment. However, collateral exists in that
ownership is retained until the customer settles the account in full.
In addition, a payment rating system manages the customer’s payment profile. A
payment rating is applied to each customer individually and is based on the
customer’s payment history relative to their contractual arrangements. This
payment rating is integral to the calculation of the doubtful debt provision in
terms of IAS 39. IAS 39 requires that all impaired receivables are carried at
their net present value of the expected cash flows from such accounts,
discounted at the original effective rate implicit in the credit agreement.
|
| |
|
|
The ageing of satisfactory paid receivables past due but not impaired as a percentage of satisfactory paid receivables is as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
Group |
| |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2007 |
| |
|
|
1 instalment in arrear |
|
4.9% |
5.2% |
| |
|
|
2 instalments in arrear |
|
3.1% |
3.1% |
| |
|
|
3 instalments in arrear |
|
2.1% |
2.0% |
| |
|
|
4 instalments in arrear |
|
1.5% |
1.4% |
| |
|
|
4 or more instalments in arrear |
|
2.5% |
2.4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
14.1% |
14.1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ii) |
Fixed income securities and deposits |
| |
|
|
Credit risk may also arise when an entity has its credit rating downgraded causing the fair value of the groups investment in that entitys financial instruments to fall. The credit ratings of the financial institutions holding deposits on our behalf and those whose securities we hold are monitored on a regular basis.
Deposits are placed with high-quality South African institutions. Included in the cash on hand and deposits are bank balances held in foreign currency amounting to R16.7 million (2007: R14.4 million).
Fixed income securities are almost entirely risk-free government bonds or government-backed securities.
|
| |
26.2 |
Market risk
|
| |
|
Treasury management is carried out by the chief financial officer and senior members of the finance team under policies approved by the Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee). The Committee provides written treasury policies covering cash management, foreign exchange management, interest rate management and investment risk.
The groups attitude to treasury risk can be summarised as follows:
- investment risk: maximise returns at an acceptable level of risk
- foreign exchange risk: eliminate transaction risk and net investment risk as far as practically possible
- interest rate risk: manage short-term volatility
|
| |
|
i) |
Foreign exchange risk management |
| |
|
|
Foreign exchange risk is present in respect of imports of merchandise, the net investment in Botswana and the linked policy investment which matured during the year.
Imports of merchandise
Merchandise is sourced from foreign suppliers, particularly in the Far East. In order to minimise exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, forward cover is taken out to cover forward purchase commitments made with foreign suppliers. The group strives to maintain forward cover for the next six to nine months purchase commitments.
During the year, 26.6% (2007: 24.6%) of the purchases were in foreign denominated currencies. Below is a summary of the amounts payable under forward contracts:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
Rand |
Fair value |
|
| |
|
|
Term |
Rate |
currency |
equivalent |
(gain)/loss |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
FC m |
Rm |
Rm |
|
| |
2008 |
|
|
Rates vary from |
|
|
|
|
| |
US dollar |
|
Less than 3 months |
R6.80 to R8.25 |
9.6 |
70.0 |
(5.9) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
|
Rates vary from |
|
|
|
|
| |
US dollar |
|
Less than 4 months |
R7.13 to R7.45 |
7.9 |
57.4 |
0.4 |
|
| |
Below is a sensitivity analysis of the effect of currency movements of 5% and 10% respectively on the above forward exchange rates: |
| |
|
|
-10% |
-5% |
+5% |
+10% |
|
| |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Effect on (profit)/loss |
|
5.4 |
2.7 |
(2.7) |
(5.4) |
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
5.4 |
2.7 |
(2.7) |
(5.4) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Effect on (profit)/loss |
|
4.0 |
2.0 |
(2.0) |
(4.0) |
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
4.0 |
2.0 |
(2.0) |
(4.0) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net investment in foreign entities |
| |
The currency exposure is limited to the net investment in Botswana of R84.8 million (2007: R95.1 million), which includes a long-term loan account. The currency exposure is managed by keeping the net investment at a minimum practical level by remitting cash to South Africa on a regular basis through loan repayments and dividends.
Below is a sensitivity analysis of the effect of currency movements of 5% and 10% on the year-end value of our net investment in Botswana:
|
| |
|
|
-10% |
-5% |
+5% |
+10% |
|
| |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
9.2 |
4.6 |
(4.6) |
(9.2) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
8.3 |
4.1 |
(4.1) |
(8.3) |
|
| |
There is no impact on profit or loss for both years.
Linked policy investment
Included in 2007 was a linked investment policy with Sanlam Life Insurance Limited. The underlying value of the policy was determined in US dollars with reference to the original investment and a growth in a basket of international indices. This policy matured during the current year.
|
| ii) |
Interest rate risk |
| |
The principal objective of interest rate management is to:
- minimise the impact of interest rate volatility on profits in the short-term
- ensure that the group is protected from volatile interest rate movements for the medium to long-term
BorrowingsAs part of the process of managing floating rate interest-bearing debt, the interest rate characteristics of borrowings are positioned according to the expected movements in interest rates. The Chief Financial Officer may recommend to the Audit and Risk Committee (the committee) the use of fixed interest debt and interest rate swaps as circumstances dictate. The use of such instruments must be specifically approved by the committee.
Interest rate profiles are analysed by the changes in its borrowing levels and the interest rates applicable to the facilities available to the group. The sensitivity analysis for a 50 basis points change in the interest is set out below, assuming the current level of borrowings at year-end is maintained throughout the year:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
+50bp |
-50bp |
|
| |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Effect on (profit)/loss |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
(2.8) |
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
(2.8) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Effect on (profit)/loss |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
(1.7) |
|
| |
(Increase)/Decrease in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
(1.7) |
|
| |
In order to hedge exposures in the interest rate profile of peak borrowings, the group may make use of interest derivatives and other hedging instruments in terms of limits specified in the groups treasury policy approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. In the 2007 financial year, the group entered into a zero premium interest rate collar with the counterparty being a high-quality financial institution. The value of borrowings hedged and the fair value of these contracts as at 31 March 2008 are as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2007 |
| |
|
|
Modified duration of Monarchs fixed income portfolio |
|
5.1 |
4.9 |
| |
|
|
Modified duration of the JSE All Bond Index |
|
5.1 |
5.2 |
| |
|
|
The market risk of the equity portfolio is monitored through
the portfolio’s sectoral allocation and beta. The respective measures for
the portfolio at year-end can be summarised as follows: |
| |
|
|
Portfolio sectoral analysis: |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Resources |
|
22.5% |
15.1% |
| |
|
|
Financials |
|
20.3% |
26.2% |
| |
|
|
Industrial |
|
57.2% |
58.7% |
| |
|
|
Beta of portfolio relative to JSE Index |
|
0.88 |
0.89 |
| |
|
|
Beta of portfolio relative to JSE Index, excluding resources |
|
1.02 |
1.05 |
| |
|
|
Beta measures the portfolio volatility relative to the market index, which by definition has a beta of 1.0.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
26.3 |
Liquidity risk |
| |
|
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities and the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed facilities. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying business, the group maintains flexibility in funding through the use of committed facility lines.
Management monitors the groups cash flows through the monitoring of actual inflows and outflows against forecasted cash flows and the utilisation of borrowing facilities. A quarterly analysis is presented to the Audit and Risk Committee.
|
| |
|
Below is a summary of the committed facilities and the utilisation thereof at year-end: |
| |
|
|
|
2008 |
2007 |
| |
|
|
|
Rm |
Rm |
| |
|
Total banking facilities |
|
1 000.0 |
900.0 |
| |
|
Less: drawn portion of facility |
|
(703.4) |
(429.3) |
| |
|
Plus: cash on hand |
|
66.8 |
35.7 |
| |
|
Available cash resources and facilities |
|
363.4 |
506.4 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
An additional R200 million facility has been negotiated in principle, subject to certain conditions precedent, which will be fulfilled in the new financial year.
|
| |
|
|
| 27. |
Insurance risk The risks covered under insurance
contracts entered into with customers by the group’s insurer, Monarch
Insurance Company (“Monarch”), are as follows:
- settlement of customers outstanding balance in the event of death or disability,
- replacement of customers goods in the event of damage or theft of goods, and
- settlement of customers account, should the customer become unemployed after three months subsequent to the sale
|
| |
The risk under the insurance contract is the possibility that the insured events as detailed above occur and the uncertainty of the amount of the resulting claim. By the very nature of the insurance contract, this risk is random and therefore unpredictable.
The principal risk that the group faces is that the actual claims exceed the amount of the insurance provisions. This could occur because the frequency or severity of claims are greater than estimated. Insurance events are random and the actual number of claims will vary from year to year from the estimated claims provision established using historical claims patterns.
The frequency and severity of claims can be affected due to unforeseen factors such as patterns of crime, AIDS and employment trends. The group manages these risks through its underwriting strategy, adequate reinsurance arrangements and proactive claims handling. The geographical spread of the group ensures that the underwritten risks are well-diversified. No significant concentrations of insurance risks exist.
A proportional reinsurance arrangement has been entered into by Monarch to facilitate the transfer of 40% of the risk under these policies to an external reinsurer. Catastrophe cover has been placed with third-party insurers and reinsurers in order to reduce the potential impact of a single event on the earnings and capital of Monarch. Due to the nature of the insurance risk, claims can be measured reliably. Past experience has indicated that claims provision estimates approximate the actual claims costs. The insurance result is dependent on the trend in the groups merchandising sales. There is no significant insurance business other than with the groups customers.
|
| |
|
|
|
Group |
| |
|
|
|
2008 |
2007 |
| |
|
|
|
Rm |
Rm |
| |
Movement in provisions: |
|
|
|
| |
(i) |
Unearned premium reserve |
|
|
|
| |
|
Opening balance |
|
214.3 |
184.8 |
| |
|
Movement during year |
|
76.2 |
29.5 |
| |
|
Closing balance |
|
290.5 |
214.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Comprising: |
|
|
|
| |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
479.1 |
346.7 |
| |
|
Less: reinsurers share of provision |
|
(188.6) |
(132.4) |
| |
|
Net balance |
|
290.5 |
214.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(ii) |
Insurance provisions |
|
|
|
| |
|
Opening balance |
|
26.0 |
23.2 |
| |
|
Movement during year |
|
6.8 |
2.8 |
| |
|
Closing balance |
|
32.8 |
26.0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Regulatory requirements |
|
|
|
| |
The groups insurer, Monarch Insurance Company Limited (Monarch), is required to maintain certain insurance liabilities and have a minimum solvency margin of 15% as set out in the Short-term Insurance Act of 1998. Furthermore, Monarch is required to hold certain prescribed assets to meet its insurance liabilities and solvency margins. These assets are subject to various limits in order to ensure an adequate spread and diversification of assets.
Monarch has met all the requirements of the Short-term Insurance Act regarding its insurance liabilities, solvency margins, prescribed assets and asset spread.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Held-to- |
Amortised |
Loans and |
Available- |
through profit |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
maturity |
cost |
receivables |
for-sale |
and loss |
Total |
|
| 28. |
Financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i) |
Categories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Investments insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
business |
|
159.5 |
|
|
505.4 |
|
664.9 |
|
| |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
|
2 615.6 |
|
|
2 615.6 |
|
| |
|
Cash on hand and on deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
66.8 |
66.8 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Investments insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
business |
|
115.4 |
|
|
545.0 |
|
660.4 |
|
| |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
|
2 187.7 |
|
|
2 187.7 |
|
| |
|
Cash on hand and on deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
35.7 |
35.7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
166.9 |
166.9 |
|
| |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
703.4 |
|
|
|
703.4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
185.6 |
185.6 |
|
| |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
430.3 |
|
|
|
430.3 |
|
| |
ii) |
Maturity profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The maturity profiles of financial instruments at 31 March 2008 are as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
closing |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
interest |
0 12 |
2 5 |
>5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
% |
months |
years |
years |
Total |
|
| |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Available-for-sale insurance investments |
|
|
|
312.9 |
192.5 |
505.4 |
|
| |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
11.3% |
159.5 |
|
|
159.5 |
|
| |
|
Trade and other receivables* |
|
30.8% |
2 615.6 |
|
|
2 615.6 |
|
| |
|
Cash on hand and deposits |
|
10.4% |
66.8 |
|
|
66.8 |
|
| |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Bank overdrafts and short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
borrowings |
|
12.80% |
(703.4) |
|
|
(703.4) |
|
| |
|
Trade and other payables** |
|
|
(166.9) |
|
|
(166.9) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1 971.6 |
312.9 |
192.5 |
2 477.0 |
|
| |
|
* |
Amounts due from instalment sale receivables after one year
are reflected as current, as they form part of the normal operating cycle.
The credit terms of instalment sale receivables range from 6 – 36 months.
|
| ** |
Trade and other payables reflect only financial liabilities,
namely trade payables, accruals and other payables. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
iii) |
Fair value estimation |
| |
|
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted prices at the balance sheet. The quoted market price used is the current bid price.
The fair value of interest swaps and collars is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet dates.
The carrying value of trade receivables and trade and other payables are assumed to approximate their fair values.
|
| 29. |
Capital risk management The groups objectives when managing capital are to: |
| |
|
- safeguard the groups ability to continue as a going concern
- to provide returns for shareholders
- to provide benefits for other stakeholders
- maintain an optimal capital structure as approved by the board
|
| |
In order to maintain the optimal capital structure, dividends paid to shareholders may be adjusted, capital could be returned to shareholders or new shares could be issued.
Consistent with others in the industry, capital is monitored on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by equity capital. Net debt is calculated as total interest-bearing borrowings less cash and cash equivalents.
During the 2008 financial year, the strategy was to maintain the gearing between 20% and 30%, which in the current credit conditions is considered to be prudent. The gearing rates at 31 March 2008 and
31 March 2007 were as follows:
|